|
Christian Science
Monitor - October
27, 2011
Occupy movement mirrors
Millennial Generation
By Morley Winograd and
Michael D. Hais
In our newest book,
Millennial Momentum: How a New
Generation is Remaking America, we
describe why the leadership of all the
nation’s institutions will be
challenged during this decade by the
emerging Millennial Generation, born
1982-2003. These young people believe in
individuals taking action as a group at the
local level to bring about a more
“accessible, equitable, community-driven”
world. That closely describes the
“Occupy” protests.
Shortly after our book was published, these
protests sprung up seemingly spontaneously
in more than 1,400 cities across the
country, leading one commentator to suggest
we should be given “the Nobel Prize for
Predictions.”
We’ll leave that for others to chew on,
especially because we are not yet certain
that these protests are Millennial enough.
If they were, Occupy would have a greater
chance of success as a movement. But
Millennials clearly sympathize with the
fundamental message of Occupy. Beset by more
than $1
trillion in college loan debtand high
unemployment, they believe the system isn’t
working for them.
Millennials readily agree with Occupiers
that Wall Street firms and other financial
institutions played a major role in
jeopardizing the nation’s and their
generation’s economic future – and they
haven’t paid a price for doing so. While
Millennials overwhelmingly support President
Obama (preferring him by a 2:1 margin over
his major potential Republican opponents),
one of the generation’s disappointments with
his administration is its unwillingness
to impose penalties on Wall Street for
behaving badly.
It’s as if America’s most important parent
has forgotten the first tenet of every
Millennial family – not abiding by the rules
will have consequences.
In terms of process, Millennials are just
fine with the leaderless, horizontal nature
of the Occupy demonstrations, something some
older generations deride, criticize, or
attempt to change. For instance, we learned
from Millennials we spoke to within the past
several weeks in New York and Boston, that
decisions at Occupy Boston could be made with
75 percent agreement while Occupy Wall
Street’s consensus rules required a
unanimous vote before action could be taken.
Because Millennials have been taught both
the value and practice of consensus
decision-making since they were toddlers,
none of those we spoke with questioned the
practicality of such an approach.
However, on a tactical and personal level
the Millennials we talked to were a lot less
enthusiastic about actually joining the
protests than their economic circumstances
might have suggested. In part this
reluctance stemmed from their feeling that
the protesters had no clear action agenda, a
reflection of the generation’s pragmatic
impulses.
This was often characterized as a “lack of
goals,” but also sometimes by asking
questions like, “Why don’t they all just go
out and get registered to vote and tell
everyone else to do so?” Millennials are an
idealistic generation that believes in
making the world a better place by working
together, but they don’t think this happens
just by talking about the problem. A clearer
course of action on the part of the Occupy
movement would appeal directly to the desire
of Millennials to get involved where and
when they can make an immediate difference.
Some of the reluctance to become personally
involved was understandably based on
individual circumstances. In direct contrast
to what motivated Boomer protesters in the
sixties, some worried that joining such
protests might embarrass their parents.
Others didn’t want to risk their perfect
record of proper civic behavior by getting
arrested. For most Millennials, success in
life has become a series of hoops that need
to be jumped through. Anything that might
jeopardize their ability to do that is often
avoided.
Still, that didn’t stop many of the
Millennials we talked to in New York and
Boston from at least visiting the protests,
even if they made sure to do so in their
best-looking clothes to distinguish
themselves to police who might be deciding
whom to arrest. If Occupiers brushed up
their appearance, these Millenials said,
protest critics would have a harder time
denigrating the movement as only made up of
the unemployed or poor people.
Visuals matter a lot to Millennials and many
observers from older generations remark on
how generally well-behaved the crowds at the
protests have been. Occupiers have organized
the tasks of clean-up, food distribution,
security, and even publicity in ways
designed to reflect well upon the
gatherings, a clear indication of the
overwhelmingly Millennial demographics of
those who have actually joined the protests.
Of course the outbreak of urban protests of
any kind has reawakened nostalgia among some
Baby Boomers, who have rushed to the aid of
the Occupy movement bringing promises of
notoriety and money as well as advice on
tactics and strategies based upon what
seemed to work in the 1960s.
Skip to next paragraph
Millennials respect their parents and often
look to Boomers for mentoring and guidance.
Consequently, Boomers will be politely
welcomed at the protests, but those hoping
this will enable their generation to finally
foment the revolution of its youthful dreams
are bound to be disappointed. Millennials
want to fix institutions or establish new
ones, but they have little time and patience
for tearing them down.
As Bill Maher, a Boomer who clearly gets
Millennial beliefs, put it, “They aren’t
looking for free love, they want paid
employment.”
It should not surprise anyone that this
Millennial-dominated protest movement is
organizing locally and using social
networking sites from Facebook to Twitter,
and, most effectively, YouTube, to build its
momentum. To be even more successful, it
will need to further localize its goals.
For example, Occupy Los Angeles is pushing
the LA City Council to adopt a “responsible
banking” ordinance that would invest the
city’s funds only in those financial
institutions that did not participate in the
financial wheeling-dealing that led to the
2008 financial crisis. Just as an insistence
on only investing in companies that abided
by the Sullivan Principles in trade
relations with South Africaproved to be
effective in helping end that country’s
apartheid regime, this kind of locally
focused demand could provide additional
energy and a series of growing victories to
the cause.
In this and many other ways, we believe the
success of the Occupy movement will depend
on its ability to become even more aligned
with Millennial beliefs and behaviors as it
evolves. If the demonstrators can avoid
becoming co-opted by other generations or
groups with their own agendas based on
grievances of the past, and focus instead on
the changes they wish to see going forward,
there is a very good chance that the Occupy
protests will become a major milestone in
the development of America in the Millennial
era.
|